Use of Functional Silos to Optimize Agency Decision-Making

Quarterly Report Dec 2004
Quarterly Report June 2005
Quarterly Report September 2005
Quarterly Report December 2005
Quarterly Report March 2006
Quarterly Report June 2006
Quarterly Report September 2006
Quarterly Report December 2006

Quarterly Report March 2007

Quarterly Report June 2007

Quarterly Report September 2007

Quarterly Report December 2007
Quarterly Report March 2008
Project Proposal
 
Managing the Asset Management Process (AASHTO 2005 Annual Meeting)
 

FINAL REPORT

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

Project Number:         05-05

Research Project:       Use of functional silos to optimize agency decision making

P.I. Name & Address:  Omar Smadi, PhD                         Tom Maze, PE, PhD

                              Co-Principal Investigator               Co-Principal Investigator

                              Research Scientist                        Professor of Civil Engineering

                              email: smadi@iastate.edu                  email: tmaze@iastate.edu

 

Project Objective:      Typical state transportation agencies (STAs) tend to organize into functionally focused units.  The common experiences foster professional growth, expertise within the functional area, and efficiency through repetitively focusing knowledgeable individuals on familiar problems. The question therefore becomes, how can an agency use these functional units to optimize agency resource allocations. If functional and geographical units or “silos” remain, how can a decision-maker compare the needs and priorities of one silo versus another?  How can they foster communication between silos to ensure that employees understand the larger picture and that the function is not optimized at the expense of the larger system or service?

 

Project Abstract:        While clustering professionals and support staff around functionally focused groups makes sense from an expertise development and efficiency stand point, it may not make sense from an asset management perspective.  Asset management takes a holistic view of all physical and human assets and allocates resources so that the return on investment is maximized.  Returns on investment for public agencies are usually measured through user benefits rather than revenues.  This holistic view of asset management assumes that trade-offs can be made between categories of investments to determine where return on investment is maximized. 

In reality, moving financial resources between functional areas may have legal, administrative, and other institutional barriers.  Even if the workforce is willing to be shifted, moving human resources from one functional area to another reduces the ability to build expertise and efficiencies.  Further, the state-of-the-art of asset management is just beginning to evolve to the point where we are able to understand benefit trade-offs between different allocations of resources.  Thus, it is often difficult to shift human and financial resources to functional areas where the most benefits will be earned, and we are only beginning to understand the implication on user benefits of shifting resources from one functional area to the next.  The rigidity of the system makes it difficult to achieve the asset management objective of viewing resource allocation decisions from a holistic perspective

 

Task Descriptions:    

·   A summary of best practices used to compare information received from functional and modal silos to make agency-wide decisions. 

·   A synthesis of performance measures being used in the surveyed State DOTs and desirable measures that are not used within these functional silos.

·   An analysis of the means (i.e. software, data bases, analytical tools and processes) and benefits of integrating, coordinating and communicating objective information across functional silos.

·   A model and set of guidelines to help DOTs use or modify these best practices strategies effectively.

·   A review of barriers that may exist that might inhibit or foster the use of these strategies.

·   A set of guidelines to help local agencies use these best practices strategies in their respective states.

 

Each task will result in a written document, sometimes called a technical memorandum or synthesis.  The final report will make adjustments to the chapters for flow and consistency and include an introduction and conclusion.

 

Milestones, Dates:     Project Start Date: January 1, 2005. Project End Date: December 31, 2005; Extended to: December 31, 2007

 

Budget:                       $111,375

 

Student Involvement: 1 graduate student

 

Relationship to Other

Research Projects:     Transportation Asset Management Pooled Fund Research Program TPF-5(036)

 

Technology Transfer

Activities:                  

Technical memoranda and presentations to state DOTs. .  One of the focal points is a workshop involving the development of a set of guidelines to help agencies use or adapt the best practices strategies.  The workshop will be scheduled either immediately before or immediately after an event where a number of management employees will be in attendance anyway (e.g., a regional or national AASHTO meeting).  The workshop will allow the researchers to present the best practices and allow the STA participants to both discuss how resource allocation is conducted in their agency and how they might be able to incorporate the best practices found by the research

 

Potential Benefits       Provides agencies with a way to optimize their decision making using resources already in place.

                                   

TRB Keywords:         Asset Management, Decision-making, Expert Systems

 

Primary Subject:         Transportation Asset Management 

 

Modal Orientation:     Highway