Synthesis of National Efforts In Transportation Asset Management

 

Project 01 – 01

May 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Midwest Regional University Transportation Center

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

University of Wisconsin, Madison

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authors: Bill Obermann, Jason Bittner, and Ernie Wittwer;

Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison

 

Principal Investigator: Dr. Jeffrey Russell;

Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison

             

 


Table of Contents

 

Notes From the Researchers

3

 

 

Acknowledgements

4

 

 

Acronym Decoder

5

 

 

Executive Summary

6

 

 

Introduction

8

Project Purpose

9

Why is this Project Important?

9

 

 

National Efforts In Transportation Asset Management

11

Introduction to the Concept of Asset Management

11

Educational Efforts in Asset Management

17

Research in Policy and Technical Issues in Asset Management

20

Implementing Institutional Change

22

 

 

Conclusions

24

 

 

Appendix:  Detailed Summaries of Organizations Surveyed

28

Professional Organizations Working in Asset Management

32

Educational Organizations with an emphasis in Asset Management

58

International Organizations with an emphasis in Asset Management

68

 


Notes from the Researchers

 

In the Fall of 2001, the Midwest Regional University Transportation Center (University of Wisconsin, Madison) conducted a survey of national efforts in Transportation Asset Management.  The organizations and efforts described herein are for illustrative purposes only and the survey was not intended to be comprehensive.  The results show a wide breadth of interest and research in the area of transportation infrastructure management, which is generally not apparent to many who are new to this field.

 

Therefore, the report is intended to target a general audience that is interested in Asset Management and how various organizations are approaching the concept.  Transportation professionals, officials, and researchers who are relatively unfamiliar with this area of infrastructure management may find this report helpful by introducing them to various past and present efforts.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer:

 

This research was funded by the Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration under Project #0092-01-10.  The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein.  The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, the University of Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration at the time of publication.

 

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange.  The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof.  This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

 

The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document.

 

Acknowledgements

 

The Midwest Regional University Transportation Center would like to thank those national organizations that responded to our survey and provided critical information.  Our thanks to the Wisconsin DOT and the University Transportation Center program through the Office of Innovation, Research and Education, Research and Special Programs Administration, US DOT for their support.  In addition, we appreciate the efforts of Tim Lomax (Texas Transportation Institute), Sue McNeil (Urban Transportation Center, University of Illinois – Chicago), and Dave Ekern (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) in offering advice and comment throughout our research effort.

 

If you would like to obtain a copy of this report, download your own copy at www.mrutc.org, call 608-263-2655 or write us at:

 

Midwest Regional University Transportation Center

University of Wisconsin-Madison
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

1415 Engineering Drive
Madison, WI 53706

.

 

Acronym Decoder

 

Agencies and Government Institutions

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

Federal Rail Administration (FRA)

Federal Transit Administration (FTA)

Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP)

National Highway Institute (NHI)

 

Professional Organizations

American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA)

American Public Works Association (APWA)

American Road and Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA)

American Public Transportation Association (APTA)

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) & Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF)

Foundation for Pavement Preservation (FP2)

Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB)

National Association of County Engineers (NACE)

Transportation Research Board (TRB)

 

Educational Organizations

 Midwest Regional University Transportation Center (MRUTC) – University of Wisconsin, Madison

Midwest Transportation Consortium (MTC) and the Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE) – Iowa State University

Urban Transportation Center (UTC) – University of Illinois, Chicago

University Transportation Research Center (UTRC) – City College of New York

 

International Organizations

Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM)

National Research Council of Canada (NRCC)

World Road Federation (PIARC)

Organization for Economic and Cooperative Development (OECD)

World Bank & the International Road Federation (IRF)

 

Other Acronyms

Highway Development and Management model (HDM)

 

 

 

 

 

 


Synthesis of National Efforts in Transportation Asset Management

A Study by the Midwest Regional University Transportation Center[1]

Spring 2002

 

AASHTO: American Assoc. of State Hwy & Trans. Officials

 

ACPA: American Concrete Pavement Assoc.

 

APWA: American Public Works Assoc.

 

ASCE & CERF: American Society of Civil Engineers & Civil Engineering Research Found.

 

FHWA: Federal Hwy.  Admin.

 

FP2: Foundation for Pavement Preservation

 

GASB: Governmental Accounting Standards Board

 

IRF: International Road Federation

 

LTAP: Local Technical Assistance Program

 

MRUTC: Midwest Regional Univ. Trans. Center

 

MTC: Midwest Trans. Consortium

 

NCHRP: National Coop. Hwy. Research Program

 

NHI: National Hwy. Institute

 

NRCC: National Research Council of Canada

 

PIARC: World Road Federation

 

OECD: Organization for Econ. & Coop. Development

 

TRB: Trans. Research Board

 

UC: Univ. of Cincinnati

 

UTC: Urban Trans. Center

 

UTRC: Univ. Trans. Research Center

 
Purpose: This project identifies several national efforts active today in Asset Management and provides information on their latest activities designed to help state and local governments implement long-term management strategies.

 

Survey of National Efforts

Organizations Introducing Asset Management 

Organizations are using several methods to introduce Asset Management to a wide audience.  In addition to the “primers” developed by FHWA and the initial meetings held by AAHSTO from 1996 to 1999, several other efforts have occurred or are occurring:

 

Conferences and Meetings:

 MRUTC

“4th National Transportation Asset Management Workshop – Taking the Next Step in Asset Management” (September 2001)

IRF

“Executive Seminar on Asset Management” (November 2001)

Committees:

AASHTO

Task Force on Transportation Asset Management

TRB

Asset Management Task Force

NRCC

Advisory Committees associated with the National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure project

PIARC

Road Management Committee

 

Organizations with Educational and Research Efforts

Several educational and research efforts explore the implementation of Asset Management systems from

a policy and technical perspective.  The national groups involved in this area are:

 

Course Development and Training:

Educational Institutions

MRUTC, MTC, UC, UTC, UTRC

Course development in transportation infrastructure management.  Efforts to develop Master’s level transportation management degrees.

Professional Organizations

AASHTO, APWA, GASB

Training opportunities in GASB Statement 34 implementation.

Technology Transfer

LTAP, FP2, NHI

Training opportunities in Asset Management systems, pavement management, and bridge management.

Policy Research:

NCHRP & AASHTO Task Force on Transportation Asset Management

Developing a policy framework to implement Asset Management systems (NCHRP Project SP20-24[11] – the Asset Management Guide).

TRB Asset Management Task Force

Designing a research agenda to investigate implementation of Asset Management.

Educational Institutions

MRUTC, MTC, UC, UTC, UTRC

Sponsoring research in strategic planning, decision-making frameworks, and the barriers to agency cooperation in management issues.

OECD

Surveyed international efforts implementing Asset Management.


 

Technical Research:

NCHRP & AASHTO

Developing economic modeling, performance measurement, and valuation methods for transportation assets (NCHRP Projects SP20-24[11] & 20-57)

Educational Institutions

MRUTC, MTC, UTC, UTRC

Investigating the use of modeling, GIS, and innovations in transportation technology to manage systems more efficiently.

FP2

Examining improved techniques for construction and preservation.

ASCE/CERF

Evaluating research products in transportation management.

ACPA

Developing remaining service life and life cycle cost models.

PIARC and IRF

Continuing to refine the economic investment model HDM (the Highway Development and Management model).

 

Organizations Assisting with Institutional Change

Relatively few organizations are working on the issue of managing the organizational change necessary to develop Asset Management systems.  Several organizations recognize this field as a research priority, but so far only the following products are available: 

 

 Utah LTAP

Applied courses and consulting with agencies to phase in the components of Asset Management systems.

FHWA, FP2, NHI